Fraud of NELSON: RONALD SCOTT, GENTRY: MELISSA MAE, Cause of Necessity

href="http://www.lawresearchgroup.com/article.php?story=20040812060103333" target="_blank">DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISH by John B. Nelson 08/12/04 Contributed by:
Jason_Whitney \r\nThe document below is an exact copy of the original document thatMr. John Nelson wrote on February 21, 1992 with the following exceptions:(1) many statements have been made bold or italicized to call out their\r\nimportance. The original document had neither bold nor italic text.(2) spelling errors have been corrected.(3) a paragraph has been added to the original document and identifiesitself as being such.(4) some of the references by this document to other documents are now\r\nhyperlinks to those other documents so you can review those otherdocuments also if you want to.JOHN B. NELSONTO: The American National People,The People Of The State Of Colorado,U.S.A.\r\nFebruary 21, 1992DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISHANDDECLARATION OF SEPARATE AND EQUAL STATIONI have enclosed Senate Report No. 93-549, 93rd Congress, 1st Session (1973), "Summary Of Emergency Power Statutes", consisting of 607 pages, which I believe you will find most interesting. The United States went "Bankrupt" in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and by Executive Order 6260 on March 9, 1933 (See: Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594), under the "Trading with The Enemy Act" (Sixty-Fifth Congress, Sess. I, Chs. 105, 106, October 5, 1917), and as codified at 12 \r\nU.S.C.A. 95a. On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank System, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for criminal acts. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon (See: Congressional Record, pp. 4055-4058). Congress confirmed the Bankruptcy on June 5, 1933, and impaired the obligations and considerations of contracts through the "Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, June 5, 1933", (See: House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress, 1st Session). The several States of the Union pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous socialist committees, such as the "Council Of State Governments", "Social Security Administration" etc., to purportedly deal with the economic "Emergency." These Organizations operated under the "Declaration of INTERdependence" of January 22, 1937, and published some of their activities in "The Book of the States." The 1937 edition of the Book of the States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal "Tenants" on their Land. Book Of The States, 1937, pg. 155. This of course was compounded by such activities as price fixing wheat and grains 7 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

Jason_Whitney

The document below is an exact copy of the original document thatMr. John Nelson wrote on February 21, 1992 with the following exceptions:(1) many statements have been made bold or italicized to call out their importance. The original document had neither bold nor italic text.(2) spelling errors have been corrected.(3) a paragraph has been added to the original document and identifiesitself as being such.(4) some of the references by this document to other documents are now hyperlinks to those other documents so you can review those otherdocuments also if you want to.JOHN B. NELSONTO: The American National People,The People Of The State Of Colorado,U.S.A.February 21, 1992DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISHANDDECLARATION OF SEPARATE AND EQUAL STATIONI have enclosed Senate Report No. 93-549, 93rd Congress, 1st Session (1973), "Summary Of Emergency Power Statutes", consisting of 607 pages, which I believe you will find most interesting. The United States went "Bankrupt" in 1933 and was declared so by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and by Executive Order 6260 on March 9, 1933 (See: Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594), under the "Trading with The Enemy Act" (Sixty-Fifth Congress, Sess. I, Chs. 105, 106, October 5, 1917), and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a. On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank System, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the United States Treasury for criminal acts. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to be acted upon (See: Congressional Record, pp. 4055-4058). Congress confirmed the Bankruptcy on June 5, 1933, and impaired the obligations and considerations of contracts through the "Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, June 5, 1933", (See: House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress, 1st Session). The several States of the Union pledged the faith and credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed numerous socialist committees, such as the "Council Of State Governments", "Social Security Administration" etc., to purportedly deal with the economic "Emergency." These Organizations operated under the "Declaration of INTERdependence" of January 22, 1937, and published some of their activities in "The Book of the States." The 1937 edition of the Book of the States openly declared that the people engaged in such activities as the Farming/Husbandry Industry had been reduced to mere feudal "Tenants" on their Land. Book Of The States, 1937, pg. 155. This of course was compounded by such activities as price fixing wheat and grains 7

NOTE: The Council Of State governments has now been absorbed into such things as the "National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws", whose Headquarters Office is located at 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and "all" being "members of the Bar", and operating under a different "Constitution and By Laws", far distant from the depositories of the public Records, has promulgated, lobbied for, passed, adjudicated and ordered the implementation and execution of their purported "Uniform" and "Model" Acts and pretended statutory provisions, to "help implement international treaties of the United States or where world uniformity would be desirable." (See: 1990/91 Reference Book, National Council Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, pg. 2). This is apparently what Robert Bork meant when he wrote "we are governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own." (See: The Tempting Of America, Robert H. Bork, pg. 130). This association has been engaged in activities such as turning "Marriage" (licensed) into "International Private Law", through its International Liaisons, which meet at such places as the Hague Conferences (See: Handbook Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, 1966 Ed., pg. 156-157). \r\nOn April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning "common law," in the Federal Government. ",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A. 1332, quota regulations 7 U.S.C.A. 1371, and livestock products 7 U.S.C.A. 1903, which have been consistently below the costs of production, interest on loans and inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit", leaving the food producers and others in a state of peonage and involuntary servitude, constituting the taking of private property, for the benefit and use of others, without just compensation. NOTE: The Council Of State governments has now been absorbed into such things as the "National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws", whose Headquarters Office is located at 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and "all" being "members of the Bar", and operating under a different "Constitution and By Laws", far distant from the depositories of the public Records, has promulgated, lobbied for, passed, adjudicated and ordered the implementation and execution of their purported "Uniform" and "Model" Acts and pretended statutory provisions, to "help implement international treaties of the United States or where world uniformity would be desirable." (See: 1990/91 Reference Book, National Council Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, pg. 2). This is apparently what Robert Bork meant when he wrote "we are governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own." (See: The Tempting Of America, Robert H. Bork, pg. 130). This association has been engaged in activities such as turning "Marriage" (licensed) into "International Private Law", through its International Liaisons, which meet at such places as the Hague Conferences (See: Handbook Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, 1966 Ed., pg. 156-157). On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning "common law," in the Federal Government.

"THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW APPLICABLE IN A STATE, WHETHER THEY BE LOCAL OR GENERAL IN THEIR NATURE, BE THEY COMMERCIAL LAW OR A PART OF THE LAW OF TORTS" (See: Erie Railroad Co. Vs. Tompkins, 304 \r\nU.S. 64, 82 L.Ed. 1188). The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties (See: Stephen, A Treaties On The Principles Of Pleading, Introduction, Pg. 23; Hemmingway, History Of Common Law Pleading As Evidence Of The Growth Of Individual Liberty And Power Of The Courts, 5 Alabama Law Journal 1; Swift vs. Tyson, 16 Peters 1, 10 \r\nL.Ed. 865; Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Amendments VII, IX and X.) The members and association of the Bar thereafter formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and further, to amend laws "to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to accomplish similar objectives", including hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is known today as "One Form Of Action." (See: Constitution And By Laws, Article 3, Section \r\n3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, supra, see also, Colorado Methods of Practice, West Pub., Vol. 4, pgs. 2-3, Authors Comments.) NOTE: The enumerated, specified and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgpodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland. \r\n"This is the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just as the 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between ACTIONS AT LAW and SUITS IN EQUITY, this change would ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY." (Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17, also see, Federalist Papers No. 83; Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress; Oct. 14, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms; July 6, 1775, Declaration of Independence; July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

"THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW APPLICABLE IN A STATE, WHETHER THEY BE LOCAL OR GENERAL IN THEIR NATURE, BE THEY COMMERCIAL LAW OR A PART OF THE LAW OF TORTS" (See: Erie Railroad Co. Vs. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L.Ed. 1188). The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties (See: Stephen, A Treaties On The Principles Of Pleading, Introduction, Pg. 23; Hemmingway, History Of Common Law Pleading As Evidence Of The Growth Of Individual Liberty And Power Of The Courts, 5 Alabama Law Journal 1; Swift vs. Tyson, 16 Peters 1, 10 L.Ed. 865; Constitution, Article III, Section 2, Amendments VII, IX and X.) The members and association of the Bar thereafter formed committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures, and further, to amend laws "to conform to a trend of judicial decisions or to accomplish similar objectives", including hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is known today as "One Form Of Action." (See: Constitution And By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, supra, see also, Colorado Methods of Practice, West Pub., Vol. 4, pgs. 2-3, Authors Comments.) NOTE: The enumerated, specified and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgpodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland. "This is the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just as the 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between ACTIONS AT LAW and SUITS IN EQUITY, this change would ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY." (Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17, also see, Federalist Papers No. 83; Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress; Oct. 14, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms; July 6, 1775, Declaration of Independence; July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52

The United States thereafter entered the Second World War during which time the "League of Nations" was reinstituted under pretense of the "United Nations" (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287 et. seq.), and the "Bank For International Settlements" reinstituted under pretense of the "Bretton Woods Agreement" (See: 60 Stat. 1401, 22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 286 et. seq.) as the "International Monetary Fund" (The Fund) and the International Bank For Reconstruction And Development" (The Bank). The United States as a corporate body politic (artificial) came out of World War II in worse economic shape than when it entered, and in 1950 declared Bankruptcy and "Reorganization." The Reorganization is located in Title 5 of United States Codes Annotated. The "Explanation" at the beginning of 5 \r\nU.S.C.A. is most informative reading. The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967). The United States went down the road and periodically filed for further Reorganization. Things and situations worsened, having done what they were Commanded NOT to do, (See: Madison\'s Notes , Constitutional Convention, August 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44) and in 1965 passed the "Coinage Act of 1965" completely debasing the Constitutional Coin (gold & silver \r\ni.e. Dollar). (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 331 & 332, U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257). At the signing of the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, then President Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that: \r\n"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States...." \r\n"Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to it." \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S. 669.) The United States thereafter entered the Second World War during which time the "League of Nations" was reinstituted under pretense of the "United Nations" (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287 et. seq.), and the "Bank For International Settlements" reinstituted under pretense of the "Bretton Woods Agreement" (See: 60 Stat. 1401, 22 U.S.C.A. 286 et. seq.) as the "International Monetary Fund" (The Fund) and the International Bank For Reconstruction And Development" (The Bank). The United States as a corporate body politic (artificial) came out of World War II in worse economic shape than when it entered, and in 1950 declared Bankruptcy and "Reorganization." The Reorganization is located in Title 5 of United States Codes Annotated. The "Explanation" at the beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading. The "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967). The United States went down the road and periodically filed for further Reorganization. Things and situations worsened, having done what they were Commanded NOT to do, (See: Madison's Notes , Constitutional Convention, August 16, 1787, Federalist Papers No. 44) and in 1965 passed the "Coinage Act of 1965" completely debasing the Constitutional Coin (gold & silver i.e. Dollar). (See: 18 U.S.C.A. 331 & 332, U.S. vs. Marigold, 50 U.S. 560, 13 L.Ed. 257). At the signing of the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, then President Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that: "When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States...." "Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to it."

It is important to take cognizance of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions, but due to internal and external diversions surrounding the Viet Nam War etc., the usurpation and breach went basically unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became "a wealthy man\'s cannon fodder or cheap source of SLAVE LABOR." (See: Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, \r\nTM-SW7905.1, pgs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 56). Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin within the scope and purview of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the ordained Constitution (1787), and further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said gold and silver Coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and proper "equal weights and measures" clause (See also: Bible, Dueteronomy, Chapter 25, verses 13 thru 16, Proverbs, Chapter 16, verse 11, Public Law 97-289, 96 Stat. 1211). \r\nThose exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such "De Facto Transitions" were unlawful and unauthorized, but sanctioned, implemented and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting "governmental, social, industrial economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in United State of America (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5936, 5945, 31 \r\nU.S.C.A. 314, 31 U.S.C.A 321, 31 U.S.C.A. 5112, C.R.S. 11-61-101 C.R.S. 39-22-103.5 and C.R.S. 18-11-203 ), and were and are now under the delusion that they can do both directly and indirectly what they were absolutely prohibited from doing (See: also, Federalist Papers No. 44, Craig vs. Missouri , 4 Peters 903). \r\nIn 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966", by which the entire taxing and monetary system ",1]

);

//-->

It is important to take cognizance of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions, but due to internal and external diversions surrounding the Viet Nam War etc., the usurpation and breach went basically unchallenged and unnoticed by the general public at large, who became "a wealthy man's cannon fodder or cheap source of SLAVE LABOR." (See: Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, TM-SW7905.1, pgs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 & 56). Congress was clearly delegated the Power and Authority to regulate and maintain the true and inherent "value" of the Coin within the scope and purview of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 5 & 6 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the ordained Constitution (1787), and further, under a corresponding duty and obligation to maintain said gold and silver Coin and Foreign Coin at and within the necessary and proper "equal weights and measures" clause (See also: Bible, Dueteronomy, Chapter 25, verses 13 thru 16, Proverbs, Chapter 16, verse 11, Public Law 97-289, 96 Stat. 1211). Those exercising the Offices of the several States, in equal measure, knew such "De Facto Transitions" were unlawful and unauthorized, but sanctioned, implemented and enforced the complete debauchment and the resulting "governmental, social, industrial economic change" in the "De Jure" States and in United State of America (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5936, 5945, 31 U.S.C.A. 314, 31 U.S.C.A 321, 31 U.S.C.A. 5112, C.R.S. 11-61-101 C.R.S. 39-22-103.5 and C.R.S. 18-11-203 ), and were and are now under the delusion that they can do both directly and indirectly what they were absolutely prohibited from doing (See: also, Federalist Papers No. 44, Craig vs. Missouri , 4 Peters 903). In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966", by which the entire taxing and monetary system

"Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking \'and the funds provided in this Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve Notes\'." \r\nThings steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, then President Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "emergency" because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government(?) for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit." (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596). Nixon placed the \r\nU.S. Postal Department under the control of the "Department of Defense." (See: Department Of the Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969 ed.)). "The System had been faltering for a decade, but the bench mark date of the collapse is put at August 15, 1971. On this day, then President Nixon reversed \r\nU.S. International Monetary Policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of the "",1]

);

//-->

i.e. "Essential Engine" (See: Federalist Papers No. 31) was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. (See: Public Law 89-719 , Legislative History, pg. 3722, also see; C.R.S. 5-1-106 ). The Uniform Commercial Code was of course promulgated by the National Conference of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws in collusion with American Law Institute for the "banking and business interests." (See: Handbook Of The National Conference Of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws. (1966) Ed. pgs. 152 &153). The United States being engaged in numerous United Nation conflicts, including the Korean and the Viet Nam Conflicts, which were under direction of the United Nations (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287d), and agreeing to foot the bill (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 287j), and not being able to honor their obligations and rehypothecated debt credit, openly and publicly dishonored and disavowed their "Notes" and "Obligations" (12 U.S.C.A. 411 ) i.e. "Federal Reserve Notes" Through Public Law 90-269, Section 2, 82 Stat. 50 (1968) to wit: "Sec. 2. The first sentence of section 15 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 391) is amended by striking 'and the funds provided in this Act for the redemption of Federal Reserve Notes'." Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, then President Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "emergency" because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto government(?) for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of Credit." (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 596). Nixon placed the U.S. Postal Department under the control of the "Department of Defense." (See: Department Of the Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 (1969 ed.)). "The System had been faltering for a decade, but the bench mark date of the collapse is put at August 15, 1971. On this day, then President Nixon reversed U.S. International Monetary Policy by officially declaring the non-convertibility of the "

"No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with gold." \r\nOn January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second "Declaration Of INTERdependence" and clearly identified the U.N. as a "Communist" organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the Union and People through International Organization promoting the "One World Order." (See: Congressional Record, January 19, 1976, Extension of remarks; also see, 8 \r\nU.S.C.A. 1101 (40) , 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783). The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76, on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. \r\nU.S.. Atkins et al. complained that "As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs...the real value of the "dollar" (FRN\'s) decreased by approximately \r\n34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975....As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings", and in the prayer for relief claimed "damages for the constitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969." It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the People and Children, who were classified as "a club that has many other members" who "have no remedy." And knowing that "heinous" acts had been committed, stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied ("checked more or less, but never stopped") "until all of us [judges] are dead." Such persons Fraudulently swore an Oath to uphold, defend and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican States of the Union, and breached the Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment. (See: Atkins et al. vs. \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S. dollar" (the Federal Reserve Note (FRN)) into gold." (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5937 & Senate Report No. 93-549, Foreword, pg. III, Proclamation No. 4074, pg. 597, 31 U.S.C.A. 314 & 31 U.S.C.A. 5112). On September 21, 1973, Congress passed Public Law 93-110, amending the Bretton Woods Par Value Modification Act, 82 Stat. 116, 31 U.S.C.A. 449, and reiterated the "Emergency", 12 U.S.C.A 95a, and Section 8 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C.A 286f ), and which included "reports on foreign currency transactions." (Also See: Executive Order No. 10033). This act further declared in Section 2 (b) that: "No provision of any law in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, and no rule, regulation, or order under authority of any such law, may be construed to prohibit any person from purchasing, holding, selling, or otherwise dealing with gold." On January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt noted for the record, a second "Declaration Of INTERdependence" and clearly identified the U.N. as a "Communist" organization, and that they were seeking both production and monetary control over the Union and People through International Organization promoting the "One World Order." (See: Congressional Record, January 19, 1976, Extension of remarks; also see, 8 U.S.C.A. 1101 (40) , 50 U.S.C.A. 781 & 783). The socio/economic situation worsened as noted in the Complaint/Petition, filed in the U.S. Court of Claims, Docket No. 41-76, on February 11, 1976, by 44 Federal Judges, Atkins et al. vs. U.S.. Atkins et al. complained that "As a result of inflation, the compensation of federal judges has been substantially diminished each year since 1969, causing direct and continuing monetary harm to plaintiffs...the real value of the "dollar" (FRN's) decreased by approximately 34.5 percent from March 15, 1969 to October 1, 1975....As a result, plaintiffs have suffered an unconstitutional deprivation of earnings", and in the prayer for relief claimed "damages for the constitutional violations enumerated above, measured as the diminution of his earnings for the entire period since March 9, 1969." It is quite apparent that the persons holding and enjoying Offices of Public Trust, Honor and/or Profit knew of the emergency emergent problem and sought protection for themselves, to the damage and injury of the People and Children, who were classified as "a club that has many other members" who "have no remedy." And knowing that "heinous" acts had been committed, stated that they [judges/lawyers] would not apply the Law, nor would any substantive remedy be applied ("checked more or less, but never stopped") "until all of us [judges] are dead." Such persons Fraudulently swore an Oath to uphold, defend and preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican States of the Union, and breached the Duty to protect the People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition, avarice and stealthy encroachment. (See: Atkins et al. vs.

"Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations." Numerous serious debates were held in Congress, including but not limited to, Tuesday, July 27, 1976 (See: Congressional Record - House, July 27, 1976), concerning the International Financial Institutions and its operations. Representative, Ron Paul, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, made numerous references to the true practices of the "International" financial institutions, including but not limited to, the conversion of 27,000,000 (27 million) in gold, contributed by the United States as part of its "quota obligations", which the International Monetary Fund (Governor-Secretary of Treasury) sold (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5945 & 5946), under some very questionable terms and concessions. (Also see: The Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W. Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531). \r\nOn October 28, 1977 the passage of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227 declared most banking institutions, including State banks, to be under direction and control of the corporate "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5942, United States Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-481). The Act further declared that: \r\n"(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822a(b)) is amended by striking out the phrase \'stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar\'..." (c) The joint resolution entitled \'Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States\', approved June 5, 1933 (31 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S., 556 F.2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074, The Tempting of America, supra, pgs. 155-159 also see, 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335, Senate Report No. 93-549, pgs. 69-71, C.R.S. 24-75-101). This is verified in Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5944, which states: "Moving to a floating exchange rate for international commerce means private enterprise and not central governments bear the risk of currency fluctuations." Numerous serious debates were held in Congress, including but not limited to, Tuesday, July 27, 1976 (See: Congressional Record - House, July 27, 1976), concerning the International Financial Institutions and its operations. Representative, Ron Paul, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, made numerous references to the true practices of the "International" financial institutions, including but not limited to, the conversion of 27,000,000 (27 million) in gold, contributed by the United States as part of its "quota obligations", which the International Monetary Fund (Governor-Secretary of Treasury) sold (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5945 & 5946), under some very questionable terms and concessions. (Also see: The Ron Paul Money Book, (1991), by Ron Paul, Plantation Publishing, 837 W. Plantation, Clute, Texas 77531). On October 28, 1977 the passage of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227 declared most banking institutions, including State banks, to be under direction and control of the corporate "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5942, United States Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-481). The Act further declared that: "(2) Section 10(a) of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (31 U.S.C. 822a(b)) is amended by striking out the phrase 'stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar'..." (c) The joint resolution entitled 'Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States', approved June 5, 1933 (31

The International Organizations, Corporations and Associations, had refused to pay their debts and could not pay their debts, and determined that they could pass the loss of their non-redeemable, non-current notes, bonds and evidences of debt off on others, and thereby crown their fraud with success. (See: Letter, October 26, 1989 from Department of Treasury, Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs), as recorded in the Office of Clerk and Recorder, Baca County, Colorado, at Book, 540 Page 364). The de facto United States as Corporator, (22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 286e, et seq.) and "state" (C.R.S. 24-36-104, C.R.S. 24-60-1301, Article IV(h) ) had declared "Insolvency." (See: 26 I.R.C. 165 (g)(1), U.C.C 1-201 (23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley. 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 \r\nS.W.2d 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447). In 1980 Congress passed, among other things, Public Law 96-221, providing for the furtherance and expansion of the profligate rehypothecated debt pyramid scheme, and reduced the reserve requirements on "transaction accounts" to a minimum of 3% per centum to a maximum of 14 per centum (See: Depository Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act of 1980, Section 103(b) (E)(2)). \r\n"In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face amount...." \r\nCompare this with the United States Constitution, which says: "No State shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debt..." and which also says: "Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof..." (Italics added for emphasis; this paragraph added to the original John B. Nelson document of February 21, 1992 on July 18, 1999 to reiterate what was stated previously in this document and to demonstrate, first hand, yet another way the Constitution is being usurped, in fact and in intent). \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C. 463) shall not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section." The International Organizations, Corporations and Associations, had refused to pay their debts and could not pay their debts, and determined that they could pass the loss of their non-redeemable, non-current notes, bonds and evidences of debt off on others, and thereby crown their fraud with success. (See: Letter, October 26, 1989 from Department of Treasury, Russell L. Munk, Assistant General Counsel (International Affairs), as recorded in the Office of Clerk and Recorder, Baca County, Colorado, at Book, 540 Page 364). The de facto United States as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A. 286e, et seq.) and "state" (C.R.S. 24-36-104, C.R.S. 24-60-1301, Article IV(h) ) had declared "Insolvency." (See: 26 I.R.C. 165 (g)(1), U.C.C 1-201 (23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley. 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W.2d 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447). In 1980 Congress passed, among other things, Public Law 96-221, providing for the furtherance and expansion of the profligate rehypothecated debt pyramid scheme, and reduced the reserve requirements on "transaction accounts" to a minimum of 3% per centum to a maximum of 14 per centum (See: Depository Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act of 1980, Section 103(b) (E)(2)). "In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a dollar bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries. Coins do have some intrinsic value as metal, but generally far less than their face amount...." Compare this with the United States Constitution, which says: "No State shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debt..." and which also says: "Congress shall have the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof..." (Italics added for emphasis; this paragraph added to the original John B. Nelson document of February 21, 1992 on July 18, 1999 to reiterate what was stated previously in this document and to demonstrate, first hand, yet another way the Constitution is being usurped, in fact and in intent).

"In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered several centuries ago. At one time, bankers were merely middlemen. They made profit by accepting gold and coins brought to them for safekeeping and lending them to borrowers. But they soon found that the receipts they issued to depositors were being used as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money. \r\nThen bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving borrowers their promises to pay (bank notes). In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment. \r\nTransaction deposits are the modern counter-part of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries to the credit of borrowers which the borrowers, in turn, could "spend" by writing checks, thereby "printing their own money." (See: Modern Money Mechanics , a workbook on deposits currency and bank reserves., 1982 Rev. Ed., Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, \r\nP.O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690, pgs. 3 & 4). Fifty nine (59) years is NOT "temporary." It\'s a permanent state of "Emergency", and was clearly instituted, formed and erected within the Union through gross usurpations, abridgments, malfeasance and breach of legal duties, and the continual contrivance, misrepresentation, conversion, fluctuations, fraud and avarice of the International Financial Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and Associations, including the Federal Reserve, their "fiscal and depository agent" 22 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

"In the absence of legal reserve requirements, banks can build up deposits by increasing loans and investments so long as they keep enough currency on hand to redeem whatever amounts the holders of deposits want to convert into currency. This unique attribute of the banking business was discovered several centuries ago. At one time, bankers were merely middlemen. They made profit by accepting gold and coins brought to them for safekeeping and lending them to borrowers. But they soon found that the receipts they issued to depositors were being used as money since whoever held them could go to the banker and exchange them for metallic money. Then bankers discovered that they could make loans merely by giving borrowers their promises to pay (bank notes). In this way, banks began to create money. More notes could be issued than the gold and coin on hand because only a portion of the notes outstanding would be presented for payment at any one time. Enough metallic money had to be kept on hand, of course, to redeem whatever volume of notes was presented for payment. Transaction deposits are the modern counter-part of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries to the credit of borrowers which the borrowers, in turn, could "spend" by writing checks, thereby "printing their own money." (See: Modern Money Mechanics , a workbook on deposits currency and bank reserves., 1982 Rev. Ed., Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, P.O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690, pgs. 3 & 4). Fifty nine (59) years is NOT "temporary." It's a permanent state of "Emergency", and was clearly instituted, formed and erected within the Union through gross usurpations, abridgments, malfeasance and breach of legal duties, and the continual contrivance, misrepresentation, conversion, fluctuations, fraud and avarice of the International Financial Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and Associations, including the Federal Reserve, their "fiscal and depository agent" 22

The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 \r\nU.S.C.A 286e ) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, \r\nU.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242). The real party in interest is not the dejure "United States of America" or "State", but "The Bank" and "The Fund." (22 U.S.C.A 286, et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103). The acts committed under fraud , force and seizures are many times done under "Letters of Marque and Reprisal" \r\ni.e. "recapture." (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323 ). Such principles as "Fraud and Justice NEVER dwell together" Wingate\'s Maxims 680, and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." Broom\'s Maxims 297, 729; Cowper\'s Reports 343; 5 Scott\'s New Reports 558; 10 Mass. 276; 38 Fed. 800, are too high of a thought concept, as is "Due Process", "Just Compensation" and Justice itself. Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses, nor will the color of the cloth one wears cover-up the usurpations, lies, trickery and deceits. When Black is fraudulently declared to be White, not all will live in darkness. As astutely observed by Will Rogers, "there are men running governments who shouldn\'t be allowed to play with matches", and is as applicable today as Jesus\' statements about Lawyers. \r\nThe contrived "emergency" has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority. As stated in Senate Report 93-549: "Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971. \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A. 286d. This profligate practice has led to such "Emergency" legislation as the "Public Debt Limit-Balance Budget And Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985", Public Law 99-177, etc. The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 U.S.C.A 286e ) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242). The real party in interest is not the dejure "United States of America" or "State", but "The Bank" and "The Fund." (22 U.S.C.A 286, et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103). The acts committed under fraud , force and seizures are many times done under "Letters of Marque and Reprisal" i.e. "recapture." (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323 ). Such principles as "Fraud and Justice NEVER dwell together" Wingate's Maxims 680, and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." Broom's Maxims 297, 729; Cowper's Reports 343; 5 Scott's New Reports 558; 10 Mass. 276; 38 Fed. 800, are too high of a thought concept, as is "Due Process", "Just Compensation" and Justice itself. Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses, nor will the color of the cloth one wears cover-up the usurpations, lies, trickery and deceits. When Black is fraudulently declared to be White, not all will live in darkness. As astutely observed by Will Rogers, "there are men running governments who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches", and is as applicable today as Jesus' statements about Lawyers. The contrived "emergency" has created numerous abuses and usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority. As stated in Senate Report 93-549: "Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971.

These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal Law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process. \r\nUnder the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens." (See: Foreword, pg. III). \r\nThe "Introduction", on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, to wit: "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency..." \r\nAccording to the research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no "emergency" justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. Arguendo, "Supremacy Clause" and "Separation of Powers", it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has occurred. The statements heard in the federal and state Tribunals, on numerous occasions, that Constitutional arguments are "immaterial", "frivolous" etc., is based upon the concealment, furtherance and compounding of the Frauds and "Emergency" created and sustained by the "Expatriated", ALIENS of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. (See: Letter , Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg. 7, Lowell L. Flanders, President, \r\n",1]

);

//-->

These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal Law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional process. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens." (See: Foreword, pg. III). The "Introduction", on page 1, begins with a phenomenal declaration, to wit: "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency..." According to the research done in 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections 71 and 82, no "emergency" justifies a violation of any Constitutional provision. Arguendo, "Supremacy Clause" and "Separation of Powers", it is clearly admitted in Senate Report No. 93-549 that abridgment has occurred. The statements heard in the federal and state Tribunals, on numerous occasions, that Constitutional arguments are "immaterial", "frivolous" etc., is based upon the concealment, furtherance and compounding of the Frauds and "Emergency" created and sustained by the "Expatriated", ALIENS of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations. (See: Letter , Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg. 7, Lowell L. Flanders, President,

The Internal Revenue Service entered into a "service agreement" with the \r\nU.S. Treasury Department (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development, pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91. The Agency For International Development is an International paramilitary operation (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs. 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Section 1-10(7) (c)(1), 22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 284), and includes such activities as "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area." (See: FM 41-10, pg. 1-7, Section 110(7)(c)(4)) also see, Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 \r\nU.S.C.A 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the "Agreement" regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record - Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instant. \r\nThe International Organizational intents, purposes and activities include complete control of "Public Finance" i.e. "control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking agencies and affiliates." (See: FM 41-10, \r\npgs.2-30 thru 2-31, Section 251. Public Finance). This of course complies with "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, which discloses a declaration of war upon the American people (See: pg. 3 & 7), monetary control by the Internationalist, through information etc. solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service ( See: \r\nTM-SW7905.1 , pg. 48, also see, 22 ",1]

);

//-->

U.N. Staff Union, New York) 8 U.S.C.A. 1481 is one of the controlling statutes on expatriation, as is 22 U.S.C.A. 611, 612 & 613 and 50 U.S.C.A. 781. The Internal Revenue Service entered into a "service agreement" with the U.S. Treasury Department (See: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26) and the Agency for International Development, pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91. The Agency For International Development is an International paramilitary operation (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs. 1-4, Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Section 1-10(7) (c)(1), 22 U.S.C.A. 284), and includes such activities as "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area." (See: FM 41-10, pg. 1-7, Section 110(7)(c)(4)) also see, Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the "Agreement" regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record - Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instant. The International Organizational intents, purposes and activities include complete control of "Public Finance" i.e. "control, supervision, and audit of indigenous fiscal resources; budget practices, taxation, expenditures of public funds, currency issues, and banking agencies and affiliates." (See: FM 41-10, pgs.2-30 thru 2-31, Section 251. Public Finance). This of course complies with "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, which discloses a declaration of war upon the American people (See: pg. 3 & 7), monetary control by the Internationalist, through information etc. solicited and collected by the Internal Revenue Service ( See: TM-SW7905.1 , pg. 48, also see, 22

It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service Agents. etc., are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938." They are directed and controlled by the corporate "Governor" of "The Fund" a/k/a "Secretary of Treasury" (See: Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, \r\nU.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A 7701 (a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10), and the corporate "Governor" of "The Bank" 22 U.S.C.A 286 & 286a, acting as "information-service employees" 22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 611 (c)(ii), and have been and do now "solicit, collect, disburse or dispense" contribution [Tax-pecuniary contribution, Blacks Law Dic. 5th ed.], loans, money or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 \r\nU.S.C.A 611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the "Agency For International Development." (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 611 (c)(2) ). The Internal Revenue Service is also an agency of the International Criminal Police Organization, and solicits and collects information for 150 Foreign Powers. (See: 22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 263a, The United States Government Manual, 1990/91, pg. 385, see also, The Ron Paul Money Book, pg. 250 - 251). It should be further noted that Congress has appropriated, transferred, and converted vast sums to Foreign Powers (See: 22 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A 286f & Executive order No. 10033, 26 U.S.C.A 6103 (k)(4)) and who is operating and enforcing the seditious International program. (See: TM-SW7905.1, pg. 52). The 1985 Edition of the Department Of Army Field Manual, FM 41-10 further describes the International "Civil Affairs" operations. At page 3-6 it is admitted that the A.I.D. is autonomous and under direction of the International Development Cooperation Agency, and at page 3-8 that the operation is "paramilitary." The International Organization(s) intents and purposes was to promote, implement,, and enforce a "DICTATORSHIP OVER FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES." (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 186). It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service Agents. etc., are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938." They are directed and controlled by the corporate "Governor" of "The Fund" a/k/a "Secretary of Treasury" (See: Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A 7701 (a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10), and the corporate "Governor" of "The Bank" 22 U.S.C.A 286 & 286a, acting as "information-service employees" 22 U.S.C.A. 611 (c)(ii), and have been and do now "solicit, collect, disburse or dispense" contribution [Tax-pecuniary contribution, Blacks Law Dic. 5th ed.], loans, money or other things of value for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 U.S.C.A 611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements with a Foreign Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the "Agency For International Development." (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 611 (c)(2) ). The Internal Revenue Service is also an agency of the International Criminal Police Organization, and solicits and collects information for 150 Foreign Powers. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 263a, The United States Government Manual, 1990/91, pg. 385, see also, The Ron Paul Money Book, pg. 250 - 251). It should be further noted that Congress has appropriated, transferred, and converted vast sums to Foreign Powers (See: 22

Among other reasons for lack of authority to act, such as a Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 U.S.C.A. 612 and 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951, military authority cannot be imposed into civil affairs. (See: Department Of The Army Pamphlet 27100-70, Military Law Review, Vol. 70). The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the \r\nU.N. from "intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state..." Korea, Viet Nam, Ethiopia, Angola, Kuwait, etc., etc., are evidence enough of the "BAD FAITH" of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations, not to mention the seizing of two day care centers in the State of Minnesota by their agents, and holding the children as collateral/hostages for payment/ransom of their fraudulent, dishonored, rehypothecated debt credit, worthless securities. Such is the "Rule Of Law" "as envisioned by the Founders" of the United Nations. Such is Communist terrorism, despotism and tyranny. ALL WERE AND ARE OUTLAWED HERE. \r\nI hope this communication finds you well and mentally strong for the occasion. It is quite apparent that the "Treasonous" and "Seditious" are brewing up a storm of untold magnitude. Bush\'s public address of September 11, 1991 (See: Weekly Compilation Of Presidential Documents), should further qualify what is being said here. He admitted "Interdependence" (See also: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5950), "One World Order" (See: also: Extension Of Remarks, January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt, 8 \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A. 262c(b)), and has entered into numerous foreign Taxing Treaties (conventions) (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 285g, 22 U.S.C.A. 287j) and other Agreements, which are solicited and collected pursuant to 26 I.R.C. 6103(k)(4). Along with the other documentary evidence submitted herewith, this should absolve any further doubt as to the true character of the party. Such restrictions as "For the general welfare and common defense of the United States" (See: Constitution (1787), Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) apparently aren't applicable, and the fraudulent rehypothecated debt credit will be merely added to the insolvent nature of the continual "emergency", and the reciprocal socio/economic repercussions laid upon present and future generations. Among other reasons for lack of authority to act, such as a Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 U.S.C.A. 612 and 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951, military authority cannot be imposed into civil affairs. (See: Department Of The Army Pamphlet 27100-70, Military Law Review, Vol. 70). The United Nations Charter, Article 2, Section 7, further prohibits the U.N. from "intervening in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state..." Korea, Viet Nam, Ethiopia, Angola, Kuwait, etc., etc., are evidence enough of the "BAD FAITH" of the United Nations and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations, not to mention the seizing of two day care centers in the State of Minnesota by their agents, and holding the children as collateral/hostages for payment/ransom of their fraudulent, dishonored, rehypothecated debt credit, worthless securities. Such is the "Rule Of Law" "as envisioned by the Founders" of the United Nations. Such is Communist terrorism, despotism and tyranny. ALL WERE AND ARE OUTLAWED HERE. I hope this communication finds you well and mentally strong for the occasion. It is quite apparent that the "Treasonous" and "Seditious" are brewing up a storm of untold magnitude. Bush's public address of September 11, 1991 (See: Weekly Compilation Of Presidential Documents), should further qualify what is being said here. He admitted "Interdependence" (See also: Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5950), "One World Order" (See: also: Extension Of Remarks, January 19, 1976, Marjorie S. Holt, 8

It is worthy of note that an Attorney/Representative is required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement" pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(1)(iv) & 612, if representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 \r\nU.S.C.A. 613, Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951). On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another "Constitution", namely, the "Constitution of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization", found at Senate, Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more than qualify the internationalist intents. The "Preamble", Article 1, "Objectives" and Article 2, "Functions", clearly evidences their intent to direct, control, finance and subsidize all "natural and human resources" and "agro-related as well as basic industries", through "dynamic social and economic changes" "with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order." The high flown rhetoric is obviously of "Communist" origin and intents. An unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim in the Preamble that they intend to establish "rational and equitable international economic relations", yet openly declared that they no longer "stabilize the value of the dollar" nor "assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States" is purely misrepresentation, deceit and fraud. (See: Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg. 1229). This was augmented by Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat. 1195, which discloses massive appropriations of rehypothecated debt credit for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers, including "Communist " countries of satellites, International control of natural and human resources, etc., etc. A "Resource" is a claim of "property" and when related to people constitutes "slavery." \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A. 1101(40)), affiliation and collusion with the Soviet Union Oligarchy (50 U.S.C.A. 781), direction by the U.N., 22 U.S.C.A. 611, etc. You might also find it interesting that Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 (enclosed) states that the I.R.S. is trained under direction of the Division of "Human Resources" (U.N.) and the Commissioner (INTERNATIONAL), by the "Office Of Personnel Management." In the 1979 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A. 287, The United Nations, at pg. 248, you will find Executive Order No. 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations. And as stated previously, the I.R.S. is also a member in a one hundred fifty (150) nation pact called the "International Criminal Police Organization", found at 22 U.S.C.A. 263a. The "Memorandum & Agreement" between the Secretary of Treasury/Corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" and the Office of the U.S. Attorney General would indicate that the Attorney General and his associates are soliciting and collecting information for Foreign Principals. (See: also, The United States Government Manual 1990/91, pg. 385, also see, The Ron Paul Money Book, supra, pg. 250, 251, 26 I.R.C. 7401). It is worthy of note that an Attorney/Representative is required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement" pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(1)(iv) & 612, if representing the interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 613, Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18 U.S.C.A. 219 & 951). On January 17, 1980, the President and Senate confirmed another "Constitution", namely, the "Constitution of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization", found at Senate, Treaty Document No. 97-19, 97th Congress, 1st Session. A perusal of this Foreign Constitution should more than qualify the internationalist intents. The "Preamble", Article 1, "Objectives" and Article 2, "Functions", clearly evidences their intent to direct, control, finance and subsidize all "natural and human resources" and "agro-related as well as basic industries", through "dynamic social and economic changes" "with a view to assisting in the establishment of a new international economic order." The high flown rhetoric is obviously of "Communist" origin and intents. An unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim in the Preamble that they intend to establish "rational and equitable international economic relations", yet openly declared that they no longer "stabilize the value of the dollar" nor "assure the value of the coin and currency of the United States" is purely misrepresentation, deceit and fraud. (See: Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg. 1229). This was augmented by Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat. 1195, which discloses massive appropriations of rehypothecated debt credit for the general welfare and common defense of other Foreign Powers, including "Communist " countries of satellites, International control of natural and human resources, etc., etc. A "Resource" is a claim of "property" and when related to people constitutes "slavery."

It is now necessary to ask which Constitution they are operating under. The "Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States", which was located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, \r\nD.C. 20003, was the subject matter of the book entitled "The Emerging Constitution" by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the "Center For The Study of Democratic Institutions." The People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of "Democracies." "Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." (See: Federalist Papers No. 10, also see, The Law, Fredrick Bastiat, Code Of Professional Responsibility, Preamble). This Alien Constitution, however, has nothing to do with democracy in reality. It is the basis of and for a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy. \r\nArticle I, "Rights and Responsibilities", Sections 1 and 15 evidence their knowledge of the "emergency." The Rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are all excepted from being exercised under and in a "declared emergency." The Constitution for the Newstates of America, openly declares, among other seditious things and delusions that "Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect" (See: Article XII, Section 3), "All operations of the national government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution." (See: Article XII, Section 4). This is apparently what Burger was promoting in 1976, after he resigned as Supreme Court Justice and took up the promotion of a "Constitutional Convention." No trial by jury is mentioned, "JUST" compensation has been removed, along with being informed of the "Nature & Cause of the Accusation". etc., etc., and every one will of course participate in the "democracy." This Constitution is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and purposes, and clearly establishes a "Police Power" State, under direction and control of a self appointed oligarchy. \r\n",1]

);

//-->

It is now necessary to ask which Constitution they are operating under. The "Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States", which was located at Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, D.C. 20003, was the subject matter of the book entitled "The Emerging Constitution" by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the "Center For The Study of Democratic Institutions." The People and Citizens of this Nation were forewarned against formation of "Democracies." "Democracies have ever been the spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." (See: Federalist Papers No. 10, also see, The Law, Fredrick Bastiat, Code Of Professional Responsibility, Preamble). This Alien Constitution, however, has nothing to do with democracy in reality. It is the basis of and for a despotic, tyrannical oligarchy. Article I, "Rights and Responsibilities", Sections 1 and 15 evidence their knowledge of the "emergency." The Rights of expression, communication, movement, assembly, petition and Habeas Corpus are all excepted from being exercised under and in a "declared emergency." The Constitution for the Newstates of America, openly declares, among other seditious things and delusions that "Until each indicated change in the government shall have been completed the provisions of the existing Constitution and the organs of government shall be in effect" (See: Article XII, Section 3), "All operations of the national government shall cease as they are replaced by those authorized under this Constitution." (See: Article XII, Section 4). This is apparently what Burger was promoting in 1976, after he resigned as Supreme Court Justice and took up the promotion of a "Constitutional Convention." No trial by jury is mentioned, "JUST" compensation has been removed, along with being informed of the "Nature & Cause of the Accusation". etc., etc., and every one will of course participate in the "democracy." This Constitution is but a reiteration of the Communist Doctrines, intents and purposes, and clearly establishes a "Police Power" State, under direction and control of a self appointed oligarchy.

Apparently the present operation of the "de facto" government is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations. The overthrow of the "essential engine" declared in and by the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), and by and under the "Bill of Rights" (1791) is obvious. The covert procedure used to implement and enforce these Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., has not, to my knowledge, been collected and assimilated nor presented as evidence to establish seditious collusion and conspiracy. \r\nFortunately and Unfortunately in my Land it is necessary to seek, obtain and present EVIDENCE to sustain a conviction and/or judgment. Our patience and tolerance for those who pervert the very necessary and basic foundations of society has been pushed to insufferable levels. They have "fundamentally" changed the form and substance of the de jure Republican form of Government, exhibited a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety and Property of others, evinced a despotic design to reduce my people to slavery, peonage and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent, tyrannical, seditious foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose to institute, erect and form a "Dictatorship" over the Citizens and our Posterity. They have completely debauched the de jure monetary system, destroyed the Livelihood and Lives of thousands, aided and abetted our enemies, declared War upon us and our Posterity, destroyed untold families and made homeless over 750,000 children in the middle of winter, afflicted widows and orphans, turned Sodomites loose amongst our young, implemented foreign laws, rules, regulations and procedures within the body of the country, incited insurrection, rebellion, sedition and anarchy within the de jure society, illegally entered our Land, taken false Oaths, entered into Seditious Foreign Constitutions, Agreements, Pactions, Confederations, and Alliances, and under pretense of "emergency", which they themselves created, promoted and furthered, formed a multitude of offices and retained those of alien allegiance to perpetuate their frauds and to eat out the substance of the good and productive people of our Land, and have arbitrarily dismissed and held mock trials for those who trespassed upon our Lives, Liberties, Properties and Families and endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare and Dignity. The damage, injury and costs have been higher than mere money can repay. They have done what they were COMMANDED NOT TO DO. The time for just correction is NOW! \r\n",1]

);

//-->

Apparently the present operation of the "de facto" government is under Foreign/Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations. The overthrow of the "essential engine" declared in and by the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), and by and under the "Bill of Rights" (1791) is obvious. The covert procedure used to implement and enforce these Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc., has not, to my knowledge, been collected and assimilated nor presented as evidence to establish seditious collusion and conspiracy. Fortunately and Unfortunately in my Land it is necessary to seek, obtain and present EVIDENCE to sustain a conviction and/or judgment. Our patience and tolerance for those who pervert the very necessary and basic foundations of society has been pushed to insufferable levels. They have "fundamentally" changed the form and substance of the de jure Republican form of Government, exhibited a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety and Property of others, evinced a despotic design to reduce my people to slavery, peonage and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent, tyrannical, seditious foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose to institute, erect and form a "Dictatorship" over the Citizens and our Posterity. They have completely debauched the de jure monetary system, destroyed the Livelihood and Lives of thousands, aided and abetted our enemies, declared War upon us and our Posterity, destroyed untold families and made homeless over 750,000 children in the middle of winter, afflicted widows and orphans, turned Sodomites loose amongst our young, implemented foreign laws, rules, regulations and procedures within the body of the country, incited insurrection, rebellion, sedition and anarchy within the de jure society, illegally entered our Land, taken false Oaths, entered into Seditious Foreign Constitutions, Agreements, Pactions, Confederations, and Alliances, and under pretense of "emergency", which they themselves created, promoted and furthered, formed a multitude of offices and retained those of alien allegiance to perpetuate their frauds and to eat out the substance of the good and productive people of our Land, and have arbitrarily dismissed and held mock trials for those who trespassed upon our Lives, Liberties, Properties and Families and endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare and Dignity. The damage, injury and costs have been higher than mere money can repay. They have done what they were COMMANDED NOT TO DO. The time for just correction is NOW!

Sincere consideration of "Presentment" to a Grand Jury under the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Amendment V is in order. Numerous High Crimes and Misdemeanors have been committed under the Constitution for the United States of America, and Laws made in pursuance thereof, and under the Constitution for the State of Colorado, and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and against the Peace and Dignity of the People, including but not limited to, \r\nC.R.S. 18-11-203 which defines and prescribes punishment for "Seditious Associations" which is applicable to the other constitutions, and the intents and professed purposes of their Organizations, Corporations and Associations. If the Presentment should be obstructed by the members of the Bar, ARREST THEM. \r\nI could go on but the story is long! I hope this information and research is of assistance to you. Much remains to be uncovered and disclosed, as it is necessary and imperative to secure the Lives, Liberties, Property, Peace and Dignity of the people and our Posterity. Good Hunting and the Good Lord be with you in all your endeavors. \r\nGod Bless!______________________________John Nelson, Jure Soli,Jure Sanguinis, Jure Coroneac/o 14675 Co. Rd. 35.6Mancos, Colorado, U.S.A.Teste MeipsoP.S. In addition, I am yet expecting a copy of the "Service Agreement", (\r\nT.D.O. 91). It was located in the Department of Treasury, office of the Assistant General Counsel, (International Affairs), Russell L. Munk, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20220. Efforts are being made to obtain a copy, but so far have been obstructed by the Bar. If anyone knows where and how a copy can be obtained please do so immediately, the documents are necessary and imperative. It ought to be most informative! By the way it\'s against the law for an insolvent to make a loan or to try to fraudulently collect thereon, (See: Neal et al. vs. Clark, 251 \r\nP.2d 903). It should be further noted that an "Alien" or "Denizen" cannot sit on a Jury (See: 3 Am. Jur. 2d � 40), nor hold a Public Office. (Also see: 50 ",1]

);

//-->

Sincere consideration of "Presentment" to a Grand Jury under the ordained and established Constitution for the United States of America (1787), Amendment V is in order. Numerous High Crimes and Misdemeanors have been committed under the Constitution for the United States of America, and Laws made in pursuance thereof, and under the Constitution for the State of Colorado, and the Laws made in Pursuance thereof, and against the Peace and Dignity of the People, including but not limited to, C.R.S. 18-11-203 which defines and prescribes punishment for "Seditious Associations" which is applicable to the other constitutions, and the intents and professed purposes of their Organizations, Corporations and Associations. If the Presentment should be obstructed by the members of the Bar, ARREST THEM. I could go on but the story is long! I hope this information and research is of assistance to you. Much remains to be uncovered and disclosed, as it is necessary and imperative to secure the Lives, Liberties, Property, Peace and Dignity of the people and our Posterity. Good Hunting and the Good Lord be with you in all your endeavors. God Bless!______________________________John Nelson, Jure Soli,Jure Sanguinis, Jure Coroneac/o 14675 Co. Rd. 35.6Mancos, Colorado, U.S.A.Teste MeipsoP.S. In addition, I am yet expecting a copy of the "Service Agreement", ( T.D.O. 91). It was located in the Department of Treasury, office of the Assistant General Counsel, (International Affairs), Russell L. Munk, 1500 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20220. Efforts are being made to obtain a copy, but so far have been obstructed by the Bar. If anyone knows where and how a copy can be obtained please do so immediately, the documents are necessary and imperative. It ought to be most informative! By the way it's against the law for an insolvent to make a loan or to try to fraudulently collect thereon, (See: Neal et al. vs. Clark, 251 P.2d 903). It should be further noted that an "Alien" or "Denizen" cannot sit on a Jury (See: 3 Am. Jur. 2d � 40), nor hold a Public Office. (Also see: 50

The "out of court", "ex parte", summary determinations upon matters in issue is purely "Administrative" procedure. (See: 1 Am. Jur. 2d � 78). The jury, if any, is reduced to an "advisory jury" position, and is more than likely arrayed as a "homage" jury. \r\n5 U.S.C.A 701-703 should be of interest concerning "Judicial Review" of Agency actions. It can be found in most States under such headings and Acts as the "Administrative Procedures Act" or the "Administrative Reorganization Act." (See: \r\nC.R.S. 24-4-106). The de facto Federal/International chartered "Institutions", their Officers, Employees, Servants, Agents and Representatives are subject to and should be turned over to a Court of Law for prosecution, trial, and judgment according to Law. (See: Pope Mfg. Co. vs. Gormully, 144 \r\nU.S. 414, at pg. 419, also see, 22 U.S.C.A. 286g). "FRAUD vitiates the most solemn Contracts, documents and even judgments." U.S. vs. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, at pg. 65. I believe that the statement made in Cohen vs. Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 5 \r\nL.Ed. 257 (1821) is more than worthy of note: "We [Courts] have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, that to usurp that which is not given. THE ONE OR THE OTHER WOULD BE TREASON TO THE CONSTITUTION." (Also see: \r\nU.S. vs Will, 449 US 200, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, at pg. 406). *******DECLARATIONOF SEPARATE AND EQUAL STATIONWHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS...WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE...WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS, PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT, EVINCES A DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY..." Declaration of Independence, Enabling Act, Section 4. \r\n",1]

);

//-->

U.S.C.A. 781 (9) & 842), and any who have "Expatriated" (See: 8 U.S.C.A, 1481) are required to make application for "naturalization". The "out of court", "ex parte", summary determinations upon matters in issue is purely "Administrative" procedure. (See: 1 Am. Jur. 2d � 78). The jury, if any, is reduced to an "advisory jury" position, and is more than likely arrayed as a "homage" jury. 5 U.S.C.A 701-703 should be of interest concerning "Judicial Review" of Agency actions. It can be found in most States under such headings and Acts as the "Administrative Procedures Act" or the "Administrative Reorganization Act." (See: C.R.S. 24-4-106). The de facto Federal/International chartered "Institutions", their Officers, Employees, Servants, Agents and Representatives are subject to and should be turned over to a Court of Law for prosecution, trial, and judgment according to Law. (See: Pope Mfg. Co. vs. Gormully, 144 U.S. 414, at pg. 419, also see, 22 U.S.C.A. 286g). "FRAUD vitiates the most solemn Contracts, documents and even judgments." U.S. vs. Throckmorton, 98 US 61, at pg. 65. I believe that the statement made in Cohen vs. Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821) is more than worthy of note: "We [Courts] have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, that to usurp that which is not given. THE ONE OR THE OTHER WOULD BE TREASON TO THE CONSTITUTION." (Also see: U.S. vs Will, 449 US 200, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, at pg. 406). *******DECLARATIONOF SEPARATE AND EQUAL STATIONWHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS...WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE...WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS, PURSUING INVARIABLY THE SAME OBJECT, EVINCES A DESIGN TO REDUCE THEM UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY..." Declaration of Independence, Enabling Act, Section 4.

"No political truth is of greater intrinsic value...The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny." Federalist Papers No. 47 \r\n"IF a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberties and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information." (The Writings Of Thomas Jefferson, Albert E. Bergh Ed., vol. 14 pg. 384). \r\nOne cannot make agreements with Sodomites, Babylonians and/or satanics. Their words, oaths or signatures are of no meaning or value; their intent and purpose is to deceive, cheat, steal, lie, defraud and destroy. The seditious covert conspiracy and collusion of certain Organizations, Corporations and Associations to damage, injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate and enforce their fraudulent, foreign, socialist, Communist, "Democracy" and foist their delusions upon the Citizens and children of this Land, and to corrupt the de jure Public Offices established to accomplish the purposes set forth in the "Preamble" to the ordained and established Constitution is cause and necessity enough. \r\nOnce again finding our safety, happiness and liberties to be in imminent danger, it has become necessary and imperative to our Rights, Duties, Privileges, Immunities, Lives, Liberties and Property and that of our posterity, to declare our separate and equal station, and exercise our Right and Duty to throw off and abolish the form and operation of the de facto, fraudulent, seditious "state." (See: Constitution For The State Of Colorado, Article II, Section 2, Declaration of Independence (1776), Constitution For The United States Of America, Amendments IX and X, \r\n",1]

);

//-->

"No political truth is of greater intrinsic value...The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny." Federalist Papers No. 47 "IF a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberties and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information." (The Writings Of Thomas Jefferson, Albert E. Bergh Ed., vol. 14 pg. 384). One cannot make agreements with Sodomites, Babylonians and/or satanics. Their words, oaths or signatures are of no meaning or value; their intent and purpose is to deceive, cheat, steal, lie, defraud and destroy. The seditious covert conspiracy and collusion of certain Organizations, Corporations and Associations to damage, injure, oppress, threaten, intimidate and enforce their fraudulent, foreign, socialist, Communist, "Democracy" and foist their delusions upon the Citizens and children of this Land, and to corrupt the de jure Public Offices established to accomplish the purposes set forth in the "Preamble" to the ordained and established Constitution is cause and necessity enough. Once again finding our safety, happiness and liberties to be in imminent danger, it has become necessary and imperative to our Rights, Duties, Privileges, Immunities, Lives, Liberties and Property and that of our posterity, to declare our separate and equal station, and exercise our Right and Duty to throw off and abolish the form and operation of the de facto, fraudulent, seditious "state." (See: Constitution For The State Of Colorado, Article II, Section 2, Declaration of Independence (1776), Constitution For The United States Of America, Amendments IX and X,

Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government - proviso. The people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and independent state; and to alter or abolish their constitution and form of government whenever they deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. \r\n- IT IS HEREBY DEEMED NECESSARY-JURE CORONEA - TESTE MEIPSO \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n 1 comments : DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISH by John B. Nelson\r\n\r\nCreate New Account\r\n\r\n Newest First Oldest First Flat\r\n Nested No Comments Threaded \r\n",1]

);

//-->

C.R.S. 24-60-1301, Article IV(h)). Section 2. People may alter or abolish form of government - proviso. The people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and independent state; and to alter or abolish their constitution and form of government whenever they deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change be not repugnant to the constitution of the United States. - IT IS HEREBY DEEMED NECESSARY-JURE CORONEA - TESTE MEIPSO

1 comments : DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISH by John B. Nelson

Create New Account

Newest First Oldest First Flat Nested No Comments Threaded

\r\nThe following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nDECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISH by John B. Nelson\r\n\r\nAuthored by: arement on 08/23/04\r\n\r\nIn the Supreme Court for the united States of America(NATIONAL)We, the People, in our Natural capacity )Plaintiff ) CASE NO. ______________)vs. ))The Government of the United States ) JUDGE __________________\r\n[Article I Section 8 Clause 17] ))The President of the United States )[Article II Section 2] ) COMPLAINT FOR) DAMAGES FROMThe Congress of the United States ) CONSTITUTIONAL[Article I Section 8 Clause 17] ) VIOLATIONS\r\n)The Judiciary of the United States )[Article III Section 2] ))The Department of the Treasury ) GRAND JURY AND) TRIAL BY JURY The Federal Reserve Board ) DEMANDED HEREIN)The Department of Justice )\r\n)---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Now comes plaintiff, We, the People, stating in this filing that plaintiffs are sentient human beings living on the land in our Counties in the united States of America, \r\nthat plaintiffs are mentally competent to testify to the facts herein contained and that plaintiff does hereby institute this filing under oath and penalty of perjury under the laws for the united States of America.\r\nPlaintiff further testifies that this filing is NOT intended as: "AN ATTACK UPON LAW ABIDING PUBLIC OFFICIALS; NOR A REBELLIOUS ACT AGAINST LAW ABIDING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; NOR A FORM OF OPPRESSION; NOR A FORM OF THREAT, WHETHER, BUT NOT \r\n",1]

);

//-->

The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.

DECLARATION OF CAUSE AND NECESSITY TO ABOLISH by John B. Nelson

Authored by: arement on 08/23/04

In the Supreme Court for the united States of America(NATIONAL)We, the People, in our Natural capacity )Plaintiff ) CASE NO. ______________)vs. ))The Government of the United States ) JUDGE __________________ [Article I Section 8 Clause 17] ))The President of the United States )[Article II Section 2] ) COMPLAINT FOR) DAMAGES FROMThe Congress of the United States ) CONSTITUTIONAL[Article I Section 8 Clause 17] ) VIOLATIONS )The Judiciary of the United States )[Article III Section 2] ))The Department of the Treasury ) GRAND JURY AND) TRIAL BY JURY The Federal Reserve Board ) DEMANDED HEREIN)The Department of Justice ) )---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Now comes plaintiff, We, the People, stating in this filing that plaintiffs are sentient human beings living on the land in our Counties in the united States of America, that plaintiffs are mentally competent to testify to the facts herein contained and that plaintiff does hereby institute this filing under oath and penalty of perjury under the laws for the united States of America. Plaintiff further testifies that this filing is NOT intended as: "AN ATTACK UPON LAW ABIDING PUBLIC OFFICIALS; NOR A REBELLIOUS ACT AGAINST LAW ABIDING GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; NOR A FORM OF OPPRESSION; NOR A FORM OF THREAT, WHETHER, BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, POLITICAL, PHYSICAL, OR FINANCIAL. NOR A FORM OF INTIMIDATION; NOR A PROTEST; NOR A FORM OF INTERFERING WITH THE LAWFUL DUTIES OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS, WHETHER IN THEIR OFFICIAL OR PERSONAL CAPACITIES".\r\nNow comes the Plaintiff, We, the People, in our Natural capacities, complaining against Defendants individually and in concert, and alleges as follows:I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE\r\n1. This is an action for damages caused by the deprivation under "color of law"and "color of authority" of Plaintiff\'s constitutionally guaranteed rights as enumeratedin the Constitution for the united States of America and the Bill of Rights in amendment\r\nthereto and is founded upon 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 et seq. Jurisdiction is based upon28 U.S.C. Sections 1331 and 1343. Declaratory relief is sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Sections 2201 and 2202. Plaintiff further invokes the pendent jurisdiction of this Court\r\nto hear and decide claims arising under the Law of the Land.2. The amount in controversy exceeds $50,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs.3. Venue is placed in this District because it is where all the parties live or reside, \r\nand where the events complained of are occurring.II. PARTIES4. We, the People (hereinafter the Plaintiff) are at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint and are living within the several States in the united States of America.\r\n5. The Government of the United States (hereinafter the federal Government) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory defined in the Constitution for the \r\nunited States of America.6. The President of the United States (hereinafter the federal President) is at all times relevant to the facts in this case, operating within and outside the limited jurisdiction \r\nof Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.",1]

);

//-->

LIMITED TO, POLITICAL, PHYSICAL, OR FINANCIAL. NOR A FORM OF INTIMIDATION; NOR A PROTEST; NOR A FORM OF INTERFERING WITH THE LAWFUL DUTIES OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS, WHETHER IN THEIR OFFICIAL OR PERSONAL CAPACITIES". Now comes the Plaintiff, We, the People, in our Natural capacities, complaining against Defendants individually and in concert, and alleges as follows:I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE1. This is an action for damages caused by the deprivation under "color of law"and "color of authority" of Plaintiff's constitutionally guaranteed rights as enumeratedin the Constitution for the united States of America and the Bill of Rights in amendment thereto and is founded upon 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 et seq. Jurisdiction is based upon28 U.S.C. Sections 1331 and 1343. Declaratory relief is sought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Sections 2201 and 2202. Plaintiff further invokes the pendent jurisdiction of this Court to hear and decide claims arising under the Law of the Land.2. The amount in controversy exceeds $50,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs.3. Venue is placed in this District because it is where all the parties live or reside, and where the events complained of are occurring.II. PARTIES4. We, the People (hereinafter the Plaintiff) are at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint and are living within the several States in the united States of America. 5. The Government of the United States (hereinafter the federal Government) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory defined in the Constitution for the united States of America.6. The President of the United States (hereinafter the federal President) is at all times relevant to the facts in this case, operating within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.

7. The Congress of the United States (hereinafter the federal Congress) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as the Senate and House of \r\nRepresentatives in Washington D.C. within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.8. The Judiciary of the United States (hereinafter the federal Judiciary) is at all \r\ntimes relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as the supreme Court of the United States in Washington D.C. within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.\r\n9. The Department of the Treasury (hereinafter the Treasury) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, a Department of the Executive Branch in Washington D.C. operating under the International Monetary Fund within and outside \r\nthe limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.10. The Federal Reserve Board (hereinafter called FRB) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating without Constitutional authority within and outside \r\nthe limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.11. The Department of Justice (hereinafter called DOJ) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as a Branch of the Judiciary within and outside the \r\nlimited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.III. STATEMENTS OF FACT12. The Constitution for the united States of America defines the Government of the United States in Article I Section 8 Clause 17 as limited to 10 square miles \r\n(Washington D.C.) and territory purchased from and ceded by Legislatures of the several States in the Union for the purpose of erecting forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards and other needful buildings. Exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever \r\n(Statutory Jurisdiction) is therefore limited to the geographic limits ("Territory") ",1]

);

//-->

7. The Congress of the United States (hereinafter the federal Congress) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as the Senate and House of Representatives in Washington D.C. within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.8. The Judiciary of the United States (hereinafter the federal Judiciary) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as the supreme Court of the United States in Washington D.C. within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.9. The Department of the Treasury (hereinafter the Treasury) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, a Department of the Executive Branch in Washington D.C. operating under the International Monetary Fund within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.10. The Federal Reserve Board (hereinafter called FRB) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating without Constitutional authority within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.11. The Department of Justice (hereinafter called DOJ) is at all times relevant to the facts in this complaint, operating as a Branch of the Judiciary within and outside the limited jurisdiction of Article I Section 8 Clause 17 Territory.III. STATEMENTS OF FACT12. The Constitution for the united States of America defines the Government of the United States in Article I Section 8 Clause 17 as limited to 10 square miles (Washington D.C.) and territory purchased from and ceded by Legislatures of the several States in the Union for the purpose of erecting forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards and other needful buildings. Exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever (Statutory Jurisdiction) is therefore limited to the geographic limits ("Territory")

defined in Article I Section 8 Clause 17.13. Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 states; "The (federal) Congress shall have Power \r\nto dispose of and make all needed Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States . . . " (See #12 above).14. The federal Government has over-stepped its boundaries by imposing exclusive\r\nLegislation, in all cases whatsoever, (Statutory Jurisdiction) on the Plaintiff, by requiringPlaintiff to declare themselves "Citizens OF the United States" on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Form and the Witholding Exemption Form prior to\r\nemployment in these united States of America, through fraud: deception, threats, duress, coercion, intimidation, extortion and crimes of omission (failure to enforce law).15. The federal Congress has unconstitutionally turned over the coining of Money, \r\nthe regulation of the value thereof, and of foreign coin to the Treasury, in contradiction to Article I Section 8 Clause 5 and Article I Section 10 Clause 1.16. The federal Congress has failed to provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting \r\nthe Securities and current coin of the United States in contradiction to Article I Section 8 Clause 6 by implementing the FRB in 1913; HJR 192 - Federal Reserve Notes are NOT lawful money - "payment is declared to be against public policy" \r\n(31 U.S.C. 5118(d)).17. The federal President has failed to live up to his oath of office in contradiction to Article II Section 1 Clause 8 to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution for \r\nthe united States of America (original intent); NOT: "of the United States" - limited jurisdiction (legal entity).18. The federal President has become a "domestic enemy" by implementing \r\nBankruptcy (1930-32) and "War and Emergency Powers" (March 9, 1933 and subsequently) and "International Emergency and War Powers" (1977) in contradiction ",1]

);

//-->

defined in Article I Section 8 Clause 17.13. Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 states; "The (federal) Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needed Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States . . . " (See #12 above).14. The federal Government has over-stepped its boundaries by imposing exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever, (Statutory Jurisdiction) on the Plaintiff, by requiringPlaintiff to declare themselves "Citizens OF the United States" on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Form and the Witholding Exemption Form prior to employment in these united States of America, through fraud: deception, threats, duress, coercion, intimidation, extortion and crimes of omission (failure to enforce law).15. The federal Congress has unconstitutionally turned over the coining of Money, the regulation of the value thereof, and of foreign coin to the Treasury, in contradiction to Article I Section 8 Clause 5 and Article I Section 10 Clause 1.16. The federal Congress has failed to provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current coin of the United States in contradiction to Article I Section 8 Clause 6 by implementing the FRB in 1913; HJR 192 - Federal Reserve Notes are NOT lawful money - "payment is declared to be against public policy" (31 U.S.C. 5118(d)).17. The federal President has failed to live up to his oath of office in contradiction to Article II Section 1 Clause 8 to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution for the united States of America (original intent); NOT: "of the United States" - limited jurisdiction (legal entity).18. The federal President has become a "domestic enemy" by implementing Bankruptcy (1930-32) and "War and Emergency Powers" (March 9, 1933 and subsequently) and "International Emergency and War Powers" (1977) in contradiction

to Article 4 Section 4; "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion (from \r\nall enemies foreign and domestic); and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."19. The federal Judiciary, in contradiction to Article III Section 1, has held Office\r\nduring bad Behaviour by not complying with the following: The supreme Court has the power of "judicial review", i.e. the power to declare laws passed by the U.S. Congress to be null and void if such a law or laws was/is in violation of the Constitution for the \r\nunited States of America. They have failed by ommission to declare as un-Constitutional both the public and secret edicts of President(s).20. DOJ, in contradiction to Article I Section 9 Clause 3, has allowed ex post facto\r\nlaws to be passed (retroactive taxation), and, in contradiction to Posse Commitatus, has allowed the military to be used against citizens in the united States of America, ie.Waco.IV. NATIONAL CAUSES OF ACTION\r\n21. Plaintiff realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-20 above and further alleges as follows:22. The herein described actions, engaged in under color of law and color of authority by the Defendants, including the Government of the United States, sued as \r\nindividuals, responsible because of its authorization (automatically concurred and approved -12 U.S.C.95 b), condonation and ratification thereof for the acts of its agents and servants, deprived the Plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution for the \r\nunited States of America, including but not limited to, the fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause or without warrant, the fifth amendment right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without \r\ndue process of law, and the sixth amendment right to be informed of any nature and ",1]

);

//-->

to Article 4 Section 4; "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion (from all enemies foreign and domestic); and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."19. The federal Judiciary, in contradiction to Article III Section 1, has held Office during bad Behaviour by not complying with the following: The supreme Court has the power of "judicial review", i.e. the power to declare laws passed by the U.S. Congress to be null and void if such a law or laws was/is in violation of the Constitution for the united States of America. They have failed by ommission to declare as un-Constitutional both the public and secret edicts of President(s).20. DOJ, in contradiction to Article I Section 9 Clause 3, has allowed ex post facto laws to be passed (retroactive taxation), and, in contradiction to Posse Commitatus, has allowed the military to be used against citizens in the united States of America, ie.Waco.IV. NATIONAL CAUSES OF ACTION21. Plaintiff realleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-20 above and further alleges as follows:22. The herein described actions, engaged in under color of law and color of authority by the Defendants, including the Government of the United States, sued as individuals, responsible because of its authorization (automatically concurred and approved -12 U.S.C.95 b), condonation and ratification thereof for the acts of its agents and servants, deprived the Plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution for the united States of America, including but not limited to, the fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause or without warrant, the fifth amendment right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and the sixth amendment right to be informed of any nature and

cause, as these rights are purviewed through the fourteenth amendment. See attached...23. FIRST CAUSE Plaintiff\'s First Amendment right to freedom of speech, or of \r\nthe press; or of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances (The Crime Bill and the Counter-Terrorism Bill); See attached...24. SECOND CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms.\r\n(The Brady Bill and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Act); See attached.25. THIRD CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; and no Warrant \r\nshall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (IRS, HB-666); See attached...26. FOURTH CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Fifth Amendment right not to be held to answer\r\nfor a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury (Statutory Jurisdiction notwithstanding); See attached...27. FIFTH CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Sixth Amendment right in all criminal prosecutions to \r\nenjoy a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted \r\nwith the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense; See attached...28. SIXTH CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury; as \r\nopposed to trial WITH jury. See attached...29. SEVENTH CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Ninth and Tenth Amendment rights to powersand certain rights enumerated in the Constitution for the united States of America and\r\nnot delegated to the Government of the United States to be reserved to the States or ",1]

);

//-->

cause, as these rights are purviewed through the fourteenth amendment. See attached...23. FIRST CAUSE Plaintiff's First Amendment right to freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances (The Crime Bill and the Counter-Terrorism Bill); See attached...24. SECOND CAUSE Plaintiff's Second Amendment right to keep and bear Arms. (The Brady Bill and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Act); See attached.25. THIRD CAUSE Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; and no Warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (IRS, HB-666); See attached...26. FOURTH CAUSE Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment right not to be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury (Statutory Jurisdiction notwithstanding); See attached...27. FIFTH CAUSE Plaintiff's Sixth Amendment right in all criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense; See attached...28. SIXTH CAUSE Plaintiff's Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury; as opposed to trial WITH jury. See attached...29. SEVENTH CAUSE Plaintiff's Ninth and Tenth Amendment rights to powersand certain rights enumerated in the Constitution for the united States of America and not delegated to the Government of the United States to be reserved to the States or

to the Plaintiff; See attached...30. EIGHTH CAUSE Plaintiff\'s Eleventh Amendment right not to have the Judicial power of the United States be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, \r\ncommenced or prosecuted against one of the united States by citizens of another State, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign State: Defined - "A \'foreign state\'...is a country which is not the United States, or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than \r\nour own.", Kletter v. Dulles, D.C.D.C., 111 F.Supp. 593, 598, and further defined - Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum 1785: "The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State; See attached...\r\nV. PRAYERWHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Plaintiff demands judgement against the Defendants, jointly and severally as follows:a.) A Declaratory Judgement that the actions of the federal Government, the federal \r\nPresident, the federal Congress and the federal Judiciary acting in concert with the Treasury, DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for the united States of America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive \r\nLegislation, in all cases whatsoever (Statutory Jurisdiction) over the Plaintiff, to the detriment of lawful money in these united States of America and for Treason,high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II Section 4 and Article III Section 3);\r\nb.) as compensatory and consequential damages, the sum of $2,500,000,000,000;c.) as punitive damages the sum of $2,500,000,000,000; Total: $5,000,000,000,000; NOT Federal Reserve Notes; FRB assets only. The (federal) Debt: $16 Trillion \r\nd.) the costs and disbursements of this action;e.) all attorney\'s fees incurred in prosecuting this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988;f.) the right to amend this complaint as needed; See attachments...\r\ng.) such other and further relief both at Law and in equity, to which this plaintiff may",1]

);

//-->

to the Plaintiff; See attached...30. EIGHTH CAUSE Plaintiff's Eleventh Amendment right not to have the Judicial power of the United States be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the united States by citizens of another State, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign State: Defined - "A 'foreign state'...is a country which is not the United States, or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than our own.", Kletter v. Dulles, D.C.D.C., 111 F.Supp. 593, 598, and further defined - Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum 1785: "The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State; See attached... V. PRAYERWHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Plaintiff demands judgement against the Defendants, jointly and severally as follows:a.) A Declaratory Judgement that the actions of the federal Government, the federal President, the federal Congress and the federal Judiciary acting in concert with the Treasury, DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for the united States of America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive Legislation, in all cases whatsoever (Statutory Jurisdiction) over the Plaintiff, to the detriment of lawful money in these united States of America and for Treason,high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II Section 4 and Article III Section 3); b.) as compensatory and consequential damages, the sum of $2,500,000,000,000;c.) as punitive damages the sum of $2,500,000,000,000; Total: $5,000,000,000,000; NOT Federal Reserve Notes; FRB assets only. The (federal) Debt: $16 Trillion d.) the costs and disbursements of this action;e.) all attorney's fees incurred in prosecuting this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988;f.) the right to amend this complaint as needed; See attachments... g.) such other and further relief both at Law and in equity, to which this plaintiff may

be justly entitled or as this court deems proper.Dated: 12 January 2004 GRAND JURY AND TRIAL BY JURY IS HEREBY DEMANDED.\r\n____________________________Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon (sui Juris) as The PlaintiffBexar County, Township ofSan Antonio, Texas RepublicVERIFICATIONREPUBLIC OF TEXAS )\r\n)COUNTY OF BEXAR )I, Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon, acting as the Plaintiff in the attached Complaint for Damages, do affirm the facts and allegations within the Complaint attached hereto to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.\r\nATTACHMENTS _______________________Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon (as)The PlaintiffRepublic of Texas ))County of Bexar )Sworn to before me, this the ____ day of January 2004.Notary in and for The State of Texas.\r\n_______________________________ SEALNOTARY PUBLIC\r\n\r\n\r\nReply to This \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nSiteindex \r\nRSS Feed Powered By GeekLog \r\nCatalog ",1]
);
//-->
be justly entitled or as this court deems proper.Dated: 12 January 2004 GRAND JURY AND TRIAL BY JURY IS HEREBY DEMANDED. ____________________________Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon (sui Juris) as The PlaintiffBexar County, Township ofSan Antonio, Texas RepublicVERIFICATIONREPUBLIC OF TEXAS ) )COUNTY OF BEXAR )I, Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon, acting as the Plaintiff in the attached Complaint for Damages, do affirm the facts and allegations within the Complaint attached hereto to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTACHMENTS _______________________Alan-Eugene; Thorn-Bacon (as)The PlaintiffRepublic of Texas ))County of Bexar )Sworn to before me, this the ____ day of January 2004.Notary in and for The State of Texas. _______________________________ SEALNOTARY PUBLIC
Reply to This

Siteindex RSS Feed Powered By GeekLog Catalog
Contact Copyright © 2005 Law Research Group\r\n All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.